SourceTree vs Github Desktop – Which one to use

Sourcetree and GitHub Desktop are both free, GUI-based Git clients aimed at simplifying version control for developers. While they share the same core purpose—making Git more accessible—they differ in features, UI design, integration options, and target audiences.


Installation & Setup

  • Sourcetree
    • Download: https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/
    • Supported OS: Windows 10+, macOS 10.13+
    • Prerequisites: Comes bundled with its own Git, or can be pointed to a system Git install.
    • Initial Setup: Wizard guides SSH key generation, authentication with Bitbucket/GitHub/GitLab.
  • GitHub Desktop
    • Download: https://desktop.github.com/
    • Supported OS: Windows 10+, macOS 10.15+
    • Prerequisites: Bundled Git; seamless login with GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.
    • Initial Setup: One-click sign-in with GitHub; auto-syncs repositories from your GitHub account.

Feature Comparison

FeatureSourcetreeGitHub Desktop
Branch VisualizationDetailed graph view with drag-and-drop for rebasing/mergingLinear graph, simpler but less configurable
Staging & CommitFile-by-file staging, inline diff viewAll-or-nothing staging, side-by-side diff
Interactive RebaseFull support via UIBasic support via command line only
Conflict ResolutionBuilt-in merge tool integration (DiffMerge, Beyond Compare)Contextual conflict editor with choice panels
Submodule ManagementNative submodule supportLimited; requires CLI
Custom Actions / HooksDefine custom actions (e.g., launch scripts)No UI for custom Git hooks
Git Flow / Hg FlowBuilt-in supportNone
PerformanceCan lag on very large reposGenerally snappier on medium-sized repos
Memory FootprintHigher RAM usageLightweight
Platform IntegrationAtlassian Bitbucket, JiraDeep GitHub.com / Enterprise integration
Learning CurveSteeper for beginnersBeginner-friendly

User Interface & Usability

  • Sourcetree uses a multi-pane layout:
    • Left sidebar: repository tree, branches, tags.
    • Top pane: commit history graph.
    • Bottom pane: file diffs and staging.
    • Pros: Power users can access every Git feature without the CLI.
    • Cons: Can feel overwhelming; panels can be crowded.
  • GitHub Desktop opts for simplicity:
    • Two-column layout: changes on left, history on right.
    • One-click actions: clone, fetch, pull, push.
    • Pros: Intuitive for new Git users.
    • Cons: Power-user features require falling back to the command line.

Integrations & Ecosystem

  • Sourcetree
    • Deep integration with Bitbucket.
    • Jira issue-tracker linking (create branches from issues).
    • Supports GitLab and GitHub but with fewer guided workflows.
    • Custom actions let you hook into CI/CD scripts.
  • GitHub Desktop
    • Native support for GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise.
    • Automatically fetches pull requests and issues.
    • One-click opening of the repository in GitHub.com UI.
    • No first-class Bitbucket/GitLab support.

Performance & Resource Usage

  • Sourcetree
    • Tends to consume more RAM (200–400 MB idle).
    • Can slow down on repositories with large histories or many submodules.
  • GitHub Desktop
    • Leaner footprint (~100 MB idle).
    • Faster launch and repo-scan times on typical projects.

Pros & Cons

Sourcetree

Pros:

  • Rich feature set for advanced Git operations.
  • Interactive rebase via GUI.
  • Extensive integration with Atlassian tools.

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve.
  • Heavier on resources.
  • UI can be cluttered.

GitHub Desktop

Pros:

  • Clean, minimal UI—great for Git newcomers.
  • Seamless GitHub integration.
  • Lightweight and responsive.

Cons:

  • Lacks advanced Git workflows (e.g., Git Flow).
  • Limited per-file staging.
  • Submodules and custom hooks require CLI.

Conclusion

Choose Sourcetree if you:

  • Rely heavily on Bitbucket/Jira.
  • Need advanced Git features in a GUI (rebasing, hooks, flows).
  • Don’t mind a steeper UI.

Choose GitHub Desktop if you:

  • Work primarily with GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.
  • Want a lightweight, beginner-friendly client.
  • Prefer simplicity over feature depth.

Links & Resources